|
| From: | Max Nikulin |
| Subject: | Re: false positives: Re: Experimental public branch for inline special blocks |
| Date: | Fri, 8 Mar 2024 20:58:30 +0700 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird |
On 08/03/2024 01:21, Juan Manuel Macías wrote:
Ihor Radchenko escribió:I am wondering if @@[...]{...} would be better than @_... It should be slightly easier to type.Anyway, in the last commit I replaced _ with @. Let's see how it goes... Now the anonymous variant is @@[...]{...}.
Unfortunately the issue, I have reported, has not fixed. I admit, the examples have become more contrived
(org-export-string-as "Alpha@Beta{"
'html
'(:export-options (body-only)))
"<p>\nAlpha<span class=\"Beta\"></span>{</p>\n"
(org-export-string-as "Alpha@Beta["
'html
'(:export-options (body-only)))
Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p
nil)
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |