[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FR] 'org-columns-next-allowed-value' for 'summary-checkbox'es funct
|
From: |
Sławomir Grochowski |
|
Subject: |
Re: [FR] 'org-columns-next-allowed-value' for 'summary-checkbox'es functions should have 'intermediate state' '[-]' |
|
Date: |
Sat, 06 Apr 2024 12:50:21 +0200 |
Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
> Thanks!
> I improved the patch a bit, with minor changes to the commit message and
> adding more to the docstring and type spec of the defcustom. I also
> changed the custom group (:group 'checkbox does not exist).
Great. Thank you. It looks much better.
But I think it's better for "[-]" to be described as
'Intermediate state' not 'In progress'.
> (const :tag "Unchecked [ ]" "[ ]")
> (const :tag "Checked [X]" "[X]")
> (const :tag "No checkbox" "")
> (const :tag "In progress [-]" "[-]")
Because it's described as 'Intermediate state' in org-mode manual.
In e.g https://orgmode.org/org.html#index-C_002dc-C_002dc-6
C-c C-c (org-toggle-checkbox) ¶ Toggle checkbox status or—with prefix
argument—checkbox presence at point. With a single prefix argument, add
an empty checkbox or remove the current one49. With a double prefix
argument, set it to ‘[-]’, which is considered to be an intermediate
state.
What do you think?
--
Slawomir Grochowski