[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [POLL] We plan to remove #+LINK: ...%(my-function) placeholder from
From: |
Suhail Singh |
Subject: |
Re: [POLL] We plan to remove #+LINK: ...%(my-function) placeholder from link abbreviation spec |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Jun 2024 11:51:58 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
> If you are actively using #+LINK: keywords with %(...) placeholders or
> have any objections to this feature removal, please let us know.
I do not actively use this feature, however, removing it seems
excessive. IIUC, it's a useful feature in situations when the tag may
require deterministic, yet non-trivial manipulation. The current
mechanism of restricting this to functions marked safe by user seems
sufficient.
Am I missing something? Is the threat model such that it can only be
adequately addressed by removing the feature altogether?
--
Suhail
[POLL] Bug of Feature? Attack vector via deceiving link abbrevs (was: [ANN] Emergency bugfix release: Org mode 9.7.5), Ihor Radchenko, 2024/06/28