[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] Testing: Add tests for `org-tags-sort-function'
From: |
Morgan Smith |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] Testing: Add tests for `org-tags-sort-function' |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Sep 2024 14:36:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) |
I've attached an updated patch.
This one has a test where we actually don't sort tags by using the
`ignore' function.
Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
>> + ;; Sorting doesn't care about `org-tag-alist'. This is only
>> + ;; here for later when we add sorting methods that do
>> ....
>
> Then, please refrain from setting alist in this patch and add it later,
> when testing the relevant methods.
Done. Now my tag names don't really make sense but I suppose that's not
a big issue.
>> + (org-test-agenda-with-agenda
>> + (string-join
>> + '("* TODO group_a :group_a:"
>> + "* TODO tag_a_1 :tag_a_1:"
>> + "* TODO tag_a_2 :tag_a_2:"
>> + "* TODO tag_b_1 :tag_b_1:"
>> + "* TODO tag_b_2 :tag_b_2:"
>> + "* TODO groupless :groupless:"
>> + "* TODO lonely :lonely:")
>> + "\n")
>> + (dolist (org-tags-sort-function '(nil org-string< org-string>))
>> + (should
>> + (string-equal
>> + (progn
>> + (org-agenda nil "f")
>> + (substring-no-properties (buffer-string)))
>> + (pcase org-tags-sort-function
>> + ;; TODO: a value of `nil' sorts it! That's not what the
>> + ;; customize menu of `org-tags-sort-function' says! It
>> + ;; says "No sorting".
>
> Right. When sort function is not set agenda specifically (but not other
> users of org-tags-sort-function) falls back to alphabetical sorting.
As far as I can tell the only place where it doesn't fall back is in
`org-set-tags'.
> In fact, the docstring does not at all mention that
> `org-tags-sort-function' is honored at all:
>
> (defcustom org-agenda-sorting-strategy ...
> ...
> tag-up Sort alphabetically by last tag, A-Z.
> tag-down Sort alphabetically by last tag, Z-A.
>
> We need to fix this docstring documenting `org-tags-sort-function', I think.
I don't understand what is happening in `org-entries-lessp' or how it
even manages to use `org-agenda-sorting-strategy' so I'm going to
refrain from trying to document things I don't understand.
>> + ((or 'nil 'org-string<)
>> +
>> "group_a\ngroupless\nlonely\ntag_a_1\ntag_a_2\ntag_b_1\ntag_b_2\n")
>> + ('org-string>
>> +
>> "tag_b_2\ntag_b_1\ntag_a_2\ntag_a_1\nlonely\ngroupless\ngroup_a\n"))))))))
>
> Nitpick: it would be more readable to use `string-join' here as well.
Done
>From 04fe8d44aba77b79a3a0f6ad332a0fb07bdb21a2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Morgan Smith <Morgan.J.Smith@outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 11:27:34 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Testing: Add tests for `org-tags-sort-function'
* testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el (test-org-agenda/tags-sorting): New
test.
---
testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
diff --git a/testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el b/testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el
index 778f91e8e..a06d02064 100644
--- a/testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el
+++ b/testing/lisp/test-org-agenda.el
@@ -655,6 +655,50 @@ Sunday 7 January 2024
(buffer-string))))))
(org-test-agenda--kill-all-agendas))))
+(ert-deftest test-org-agenda/tags-sorting ()
+ "Test if `org-agenda' sorts tags according to `org-tags-sort-function'."
+ (let ((org-agenda-custom-commands
+ '(("f" "no fluff" todo ""
+ ((org-agenda-todo-keyword-format "")
+ (org-agenda-overriding-header "")
+ (org-agenda-prefix-format "")
+ (org-agenda-remove-tags t)
+ (org-agenda-sorting-strategy '(tag-up)))))))
+ (org-test-agenda-with-agenda
+ (string-join
+ '("* TODO group_a :group_a:"
+ "* TODO tag_a_1 :tag_a_1:"
+ "* TODO tag_a_2 :tag_a_2:"
+ "* TODO tag_b_1 :tag_b_1:"
+ "* TODO tag_b_2 :tag_b_2:"
+ "* TODO groupless :groupless:"
+ "* TODO lonely :lonely:")
+ "\n")
+ (dolist (org-tags-sort-function '(nil org-string< org-string> ignore))
+ (should
+ (string-equal
+ (string-trim
+ (progn
+ (org-agenda nil "f")
+ (substring-no-properties (buffer-string))))
+ (pcase org-tags-sort-function
+ ;; Not sorted
+ ('ignore
+ (string-join
+ '("group_a" "tag_a_1" "tag_a_2" "tag_b_1" "tag_b_2" "groupless"
"lonely")
+ "\n"))
+ ;; TODO: a value of `nil' sorts it! That's not what the
+ ;; customize menu of `org-tags-sort-function' says! It
+ ;; says "No sorting".
+ ((or 'nil 'org-string< 'always)
+ (string-join
+ '("group_a" "groupless" "lonely" "tag_a_1" "tag_a_2" "tag_b_1"
"tag_b_2")
+ "\n"))
+ ('org-string>
+ (string-join
+ '("tag_b_2" "tag_b_1" "tag_a_2" "tag_a_1" "lonely" "groupless"
"group_a")
+ "\n")))))))))
+
(ert-deftest test-org-agenda/goto-date ()
"Test `org-agenda-goto-date'."
(unwind-protect
--
2.45.2