Re: hooks list in lispref/hooks.texi

[Lute Kamstra]

Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:

> A related issue is that it's necessary to make sure hooks are actually
> defined so that you can look for them.  At least in the past, they
> often haven't been, so they ha to be documented explicitly.  I suspect
> there still are some like that, especially buried in primitives.

This seems like an argument in favor of keeping the list, as it makes
it more useful (if up-to-date).  Anyway, RMS suggested me to keep the
list so I'll continue working on it.  Maybe I should do a grep on the
entire Emacs source tree to find them hidden hooks.  :-)

  Lute.