[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text |
Date: |
17 Oct 2003 11:52:52 +0900 |
Luc Teirlinck <address@hidden> writes:
> Alternatively and maybe better, we could, in light of Stefan's
> changes, undo the invisible-intangible subtlety mentioned in the NEWS
> (that would, in the worst case, make point appear to stand still for
> one single C-f instead of for an unlimited number of C-n's)
Note that the C-f behavior is also quite annoying.
By `undo the invisible-intangible subtlety mentioned in NEWS' do you
mean to eliminate the force-to-one-end behavior of `intangible', and
then recommend always using just `invisible'?
I notice that even lines hidden using only `invisible' cause weird C-n
glitches (it causes C-n to [appear to] move horizontally rather than
vertically after moving through an invisible line), though not as bad as
getting stuck completely.
-Miles
--
`...the Soviet Union was sliding in to an economic collapse so comprehensive
that in the end its factories produced not goods but bads: finished products
less valuable than the raw materials they were made from.' [The Economist]
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, (continued)
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/15
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/15
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Miles Bader, 2003/10/15
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/15
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Miles Bader, 2003/10/15
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/16
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Miles Bader, 2003/10/16
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/16
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/16
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/16
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/16
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Miles Bader, 2003/10/16
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/16
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Stefan Monnier, 2003/10/17
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/16
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/17
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/18
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/18
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Richard Stallman, 2003/10/19
- Re: moving point over invisible and intangible text, Luc Teirlinck, 2003/10/19