Re: cp932, cp949, c950 definitions

[Dave Love]

Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:

> I checked Korean, which is the one I am most worried about since
> it includes extra precomposed Hangeul, but the extra characters are
> all in the gap [0x3400, 0xdfff] that is not covered by current Emacs.

The gap in what?  The mule-unicode charsets?  If so, I wasn't
expecting those to help.

I was hoping that the characters not in ksc5601 might be in the
CNS sets, for instance.  If they're composed versions of things in
ksc5601, presumably they could be dealt with by post-read and
pre-write conversions operating with the compositions.

I guess you can always use the Unicode private area too, if it helps.