Re: latin1 input and underscores

[Kenichi Handa]

In article <address@hidden>, Frederik Fouvry <address@hidden> writes:
> | Me too and I don't know why that sequence is selected.  Anyway how
> | about adding a rule "__"->"_" (like "^^"->"^").?

> Would make sense (and is shorter than _ C-q ;-).

Ok, I've just added it.

> result for "_ ": an non-breaking space.  With latin-9-prefix, an
> underscore does not do anything special.  (This does not quite
> seem correct to me: the interface should be the same where the
> same characters are produced - if possible.)

I added mapping of "_ " and  "__" to latin-9-prefix.

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
address@hidden