emacs-pretest-bug
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings


From: Dan Nicolaescu
Subject: Re: rxvt vs xterm keybindings
Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 11:17:10 -0700

Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

  > > Cc: address@hidden
  > > From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
  > > Date: Sat, 23 Jul 2005 08:25:15 -0700
  > > 
  > I'm still not sure what are you saying.  Where do you suggest to move
  > those top-level forms, and what would be the mechanism to evaluate
  > them?

All the top level forms in each term/TERMINALNAME.el file will be
moved inside a newly created function TERMINALNAME-initialize-terminal.

  > I mean, I understand the principles and don't need to be convinced in
  > their usefulness, I just want to understand what are your specific
  > suggestions.
  > 
  > A test for an autoloaded function being fboundp will always yield t,
  > so I think it's useless to check fboundp as an instrument of
  > distinguishing between terminal types.  And yet you did use fboundp in
  > your original message.

I think Stefan's answer should shed a light on this. If not, I can try
again to explain better.
 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]