[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: existing work on TODO items
From: |
Ken Manheimer |
Subject: |
Re: existing work on TODO items |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:32:08 -0500 |
On 1/10/06, Richard M. Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> > i don't understand what you mean by "the general facility in TODO".
>
> ** Implement a variant of uncompress.el or jka-compr.el that works with
> GNU Privacy Guard for encryption. [Code exists but isn't assigned.
> See the Gnus development sources for assigned code concerning GPG
> use with mail, which is probably a good start.] See also
> http://www.loveshack.ukfsn.org/emacs/auto-crypt.tgz.
>
> I'm not sure I'd call that "general"; rather, it is different.
> It is a more convenient interface.
>
> I don't see that it would make the current allout.el encryption
> feature unnecessary.
if i'm understanding correctly, i agree totally.
the TODO item describes something that will provide
encryption/decryption at the granularity of the entire file. i
already had that (in the form of an addon elisp package, i think it's
crypt++), but i am finding allout's easy articulation of encrypted
_portions_ of a file, in the form of encrypted topics, to be as useful
as i hoped - way way more useful for the kinds of things i need. ie,
the ability to privately note passwords, lock combinations, sensitive
comments and reminders, etc, in-line with the plain-text context where
i need them. sliced-bread-caliber useful, for me. :-) i'm hoping to
convey that usefulness to others...
ken manheimer
address@hidden
Re: existing work on TODO items, Ken Manheimer, 2006/01/09
Re: existing work on TODO items, Dave Love, 2006/01/08
- Re: existing work on TODO items, Ken Manheimer, 2006/01/08
- Key sequences reserved for users used in allout.el (was: existing work on TODO items), Reiner Steib, 2006/01/09
- Re: existing work on TODO items, Dave Love, 2006/01/09
- Re: existing work on TODO items, Ken Manheimer, 2006/01/12
- Re: existing work on TODO items, Stefan Monnier, 2006/01/12