[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode |
Date: |
Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:57:56 -0500 |
I think what Richard is getting at, is that load-suffixes should be what you
call basic-load-suffixes and what you think of as load-suffixes should be
recomputed on-the-fly when needed.
Yes. That is cleaner.
As for me, I think that even in such a case, load-suffixes should not be
customizable: if people really want to use other extensions than .el and
.elc I see no reason why they should be able to do it via customize rather
than via a good old setq. It sounds to me like a rather unusual situation.
I guess you're right. So we don't need to make this customizable.
However, the change above remains a good idea to make things cleaner.
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, (continued)
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/01/16
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2006/01/17
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/17
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/01/17
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/19
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/01/17
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2006/01/17
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/19
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/01/19
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, Stefan Monnier, 2006/01/20
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, Luc Teirlinck, 2006/01/21
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/22
- Re: autoload and auto-compression-mode, Richard M. Stallman, 2006/01/20