[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: read-abbrev-file (2)
From: |
Andreas Roehler |
Subject: |
Re: read-abbrev-file (2) |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:19:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060411 |
Richard Stallman wrote:
> For instance you couldn't call
> `quietly-read-abbrev-file' interactively at the moment,
>
> Why would you want to? Given that you're typing a command,
> how does it hurt you to use read-abbrev-file instead?
>
The reason, why I care for this kind of - tiny or basic
- matters - is, as explained already: an essay to meet
the - naturally partly unrealistic - expectations of
beginners, avoid bewildering and so on.
I mean `quietly-read-abbrev-file' is a good idea in the
case, the user keeps just one abbrev-file (as I do). So
why get prompted for the name?
All the best
__
Andreas Roehler
- read-abbrev-file, Andreas Roehler, 2006/04/22
- Re: read-abbrev-file, Richard Stallman, 2006/04/23
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2), Andreas Roehler, 2006/04/25
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/25
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2), Andreas Roehler, 2006/04/26
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/27
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2),
Andreas Roehler <=
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/27
- Re: read-abbrev-file (2), Andreas Roehler, 2006/04/28