[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lockup
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Lockup |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Aug 2006 09:04:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu <address@hidden> writes:
> Yes, pthread_mutex_(un)lock is not async-signal-safe. But we are
> already using such functions as malloc in the signal handler context
> (with the help of BLOCK_INPUT). I guess calling
> pthread_mutex_(un)lock in the signal handler context is safe in
> reality unless the interrupted thread is also executing
> pthread_mutex_(un)lock for the same mutex.
"I guess ... safe in reality unless ..."
Maybe I have been around programmers too long, but I don't find this
exactly reassuring.
--
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
- Re: Lockup, (continued)
- Re: Lockup, Jan Djärv, 2006/08/10
- Re: Lockup, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/08/10
- Re: Lockup, Jan Djärv, 2006/08/10
- Re: Lockup, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/08/10
- Re: Lockup, Jan Djärv, 2006/08/10
- Re: Lockup, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/08/10
- Re: Lockup, Jan Djärv, 2006/08/11
- Re: Lockup, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/08/11
- Re: Lockup, Jan Djärv, 2006/08/11
- Re: Lockup, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/08/11
- Re: Lockup,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Lockup, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/08/11