[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: silent PC vs. emacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: silent PC vs. emacs |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Sep 2006 00:05:37 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> From: Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden>
> Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 09:59:31 -0700
>
> > . The blink-cursor mode uses a timer (that probably explains setitmer
> > and SIGALRM)
> >
> > . select calls are issued when Emacs enters the idle loop
> >
> > . The rest might be because the blink-cursor mode causes signals,
> > which then require various system calls, like select, to be
> > restarted
>
>
> The same thing happens when blink-cursor-mode is turned off. It is a
> bit less frequent, but still a few times a second.
You mean, you still have setitimer and SIGALRMs, even without
blink-cursor-mode?
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, (continued)
Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2006/09/02
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/09/02
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2006/09/02
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Dan Nicolaescu, 2006/09/02
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/09/02
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/04
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/09/04
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Dan Jacobson, 2006/09/04
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2006/09/04
- Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/06
Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Jan Djärv, 2006/09/03
Re: silent PC vs. emacs, T. V. Raman, 2006/09/02
Re: silent PC vs. emacs, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/03