RE: doc string for string-key-binding unclear

[Drew Adams]

    > I note, too, that the only places where this function is used always
    > use this idiom: (or (string-key-binding key) (key-binding key t))
    > where the `t' is sometimes absent. This brings to mind the question
    > whether `string-key-binding' should in fact be a separate function,
    > or should just have its functionality rolled into `key-binding'.
    
    Thanks for asking.  The functionality has been included in 
    key-binding a few days ago, as a matter of fact, and I believe
    string-key-binding can thus be (or has been) removed.
    
Cool. Great minds think alike, I guess ;-).