[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Memory leak?
From: |
Peter Doornbosch |
Subject: |
Re: Memory leak? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Sep 2006 22:58:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060728) |
Hi,
The semantic problem seems to be have taken care of, see
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=30499672&forum_id=4869
I extracted the following patch from the cedet cvs repository. Tested it
just little, seems to work for me...
Cheers,
Peter Doornbosch
--------------
--- semantic-idle.el 2006-09-19 22:49:10.000000000 +0200
+++ semantic-idle-patched.el 2006-09-19 22:50:28.000000000 +0200
@@ -286,12 +286,10 @@
(when (zerop (recursion-depth))
(unwind-protect
(semantic-safe "idle error: %S"
- ;; Disable the auto parse timer while re-parsing
- (semantic-idle-scheduler-kill-timer)
;; Handle re-parsing and other scheduled services
(save-match-data (semantic-idle-core-handler)))
;; Enable again the auto parse timer
- (semantic-idle-scheduler-setup-timer))))
+)))
;;; REPARSING
;;
Andreas Roehler wrote:
Jason Rumney schrieb:
Andreas Roehler <address@hidden> writes:
Emacs consumes all the memory by time, as `top' indicates.
Sorry, it's not the memory, it's the CPU which is taken.
Do you use semantic? There have been a couple of reports recently
about semantic's idle timer functions taking 100% CPU on recent CVS
versions of Emacs.
This seems the reason. Thanks. Found a `semantic-idle-fix.el' on the
net, will see if it helps.
Have a nice day.
__
Andreas Roehler
_______________________________________________
emacs-pretest-bug mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-pretest-bug
- Memory leak?, Andreas Roehler, 2006/09/15
- Re: Memory leak?, Andreas Roehler, 2006/09/16
- Re: Memory leak?, Jason Rumney, 2006/09/16
- Re: Memory leak?, Andreas Roehler, 2006/09/16
- Re: Memory leak?,
Peter Doornbosch <=
- Re: Memory leak?, Jason Rumney, 2006/09/17
- Re: Memory leak?, Richard Stallman, 2006/09/18
- Re: Memory leak?, Jason Rumney, 2006/09/18