[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried) |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Oct 2006 06:33:04 +0200 |
> Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2006 22:54:05 +0200
> From: "Peter Tury" <address@hidden>
>
> normally I start emacs with the "default EmacsW32 icon" (= gnuclientw.exe
> -sqf).
>
> Now I've tried emacs.exe -Q; then opening the 1MB file: it's fine (1-2
> seconds), but fundamental mode was used. In this running "pure" emacs
> I loaded the files for the specific mode support for this source file,
> and tried opening again: it still fast enough (2-3 secs). So that mode
> itself seems to be OK, but something else slows down emacs.
>
> How to figure out what? Is the only way what I can try to "run" my
> .emacs line by line (from a running Emacs via eval-last-sexp) and try
> opening that 1MB file each time?
>
> I also tried emacs.exe (so no -Q was used) just to verify if
> gnuclientw is wrong. Emacs.exe is similarly slow as gnuclientw.exe.
>
> Let me emphasize again that the same .emacs with older EmacsW32 is
> fast, so something is changed in these newer Emacses what results slow
> down -- if I use my .emacs ...
We need 2 things to investigate this:
. a clear recipe to reproduce the problem
. some understanding what customizations in your .emacs cause the
problem
For the latter, please selectively disable portions of your .emacs
until you arrive at the minimal self-contained portion that causes the
slowdown. Then post that portion (together with a precise recipe to
reproduce the problem) here.
Thanks in advance.
- Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried), Peter Tury, 2006/10/11
- Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried), Peter Tury, 2006/10/11
- Re: Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried), Peter Tury, 2006/10/17
- Re: Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/10/18
- Re: Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried), Peter Tury, 2006/10/18
- Re: Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried), martin rudalics, 2006/10/20
- Re: Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried), Peter Tury, 2006/10/20
- Re: Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried), martin rudalics, 2006/10/20
- Re: Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried), Peter Tury, 2006/10/20
- Re: Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried), martin rudalics, 2006/10/20
- Re: Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried), Richard Stallman, 2006/10/21
- Re: Fwd: Serious performace problems on Windows XP with new(!) GNU Emacs v22 (both patched and unpatched EmacsW32 were tried), martin rudalics, 2006/10/21