[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad copyright years
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: bad copyright years |
Date: |
Fri, 01 Dec 2006 17:01:31 -0500 |
I also see there that the Copyright years 1992-1998 were all listed
explicitly at one point, then in 1999 got changed to the "compact"
form. So it seems pretty clear they should be put back.
Yes, please do.
- Re: bad copyright years,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/04
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/05
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/05
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/08