[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bad copyright years
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: bad copyright years |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:07:33 +0200 |
I don't understand this change:
Index: config.bat
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/config.bat,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -r1.42 -r1.43
--- config.bat 20 Apr 2006 06:59:37 -0000 1.42
+++ config.bat 5 Dec 2006 05:36:19 -0000 1.43
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
@echo off
rem
----------------------------------------------------------------------
rem Configuration script for MSDOS
-rem Copyright (C) 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2004, 2006
-rem Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+rem Copyright (C) 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003
+rem 2004, 2005, 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
rem This file is part of GNU Emacs.
There's not a single change that has been done in config.bat in the
years 2003 and 2005. maintain.texi says (in node "Copyright
Notices"):
To update the list of year numbers, add each year in which you have
made nontrivial changes to the package.
So why add to config.bat years that didn't see any changes in that
file?
Btw, why isn't this change reflected in ChangeLog?
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/01
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/04
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/05
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/05
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years, Kenichi Handa, 2006/12/07
- Re: bad copyright years,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Nick Roberts, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Kim F. Storm, 2006/12/10
- Re: bad copyright years, Glenn Morris, 2006/12/11
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/08
- Re: bad copyright years, Eli Zaretskii, 2006/12/09
- Re: bad copyright years, Richard Stallman, 2006/12/09