[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: infloop in skeleton-insert
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: infloop in skeleton-insert |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Apr 2007 10:30:51 +0900 |
Nick Roberts <address@hidden> writes:
> It might still be logically true but generally it's best to say exactly what
> things are i.e "is a non-negative integer.", if this change is made. If it's
> not made then maybe the manual should be changed to be more precise:
>
> A "character" in Emacs Lisp is just an integer.
I think it would be more clear to say something like:
A "character" in emacs is represented by a normal integer.
Because emacs does have the concept of characters, separate from
integers, it's just that they share a concrete representation in lisp.
-Miles
--
Suburbia: where they tear out the trees and then name streets after them.
- infloop in skeleton-insert, Lawrence Mitchell, 2007/04/10
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Nick Roberts, 2007/04/10
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Kenichi Handa, 2007/04/10
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Nick Roberts, 2007/04/10
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Kenichi Handa, 2007/04/10
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Jason Rumney, 2007/04/10
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Nick Roberts, 2007/04/10
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Kenichi Handa, 2007/04/10
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Nick Roberts, 2007/04/11
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Miles Bader, 2007/04/11
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, martin rudalics, 2007/04/10
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Kim F. Storm, 2007/04/10
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Nick Roberts, 2007/04/10
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Miles Bader, 2007/04/10
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Nick Roberts, 2007/04/11
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Miles Bader, 2007/04/11
- Re: infloop in skeleton-insert, Stefan Monnier, 2007/04/11