[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The poor state of documentation of pcase like things.
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: The poor state of documentation of pcase like things. |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Jan 2016 17:26:52 +0200 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> From: Dmitry Gutov <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 2016 06:08:35 +0200
>
> On 01/03/2016 05:47 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> > The syntax of 'when' is nowhere as complex as that of 'pcase'.
>
> Obviously.
>
> But the given example uses a simple, small subset of pcase syntax. If
> you don't want to use even that, it seems to indicate that you're going
> to avoid the more complex uses of it even more so. And thus, never use
> pcase at all.
>
> Which doesn't seem like a good choice, from my perspective.
But that's not my choice. My choice is to use 'pcase' where it's
really needed.
- Re: The poor state of documentation of pcase like things., Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/02
- Re: The poor state of documentation of pcase like things., David Kastrup, 2016/01/03
- Re: The poor state of documentation of pcase like things., Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/03
- Re: The poor state of documentation of pcase like things., David Kastrup, 2016/01/03
- Re: The poor state of documentation of pcase like things., Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/03
- Re: The poor state of documentation of pcase like things., David Kastrup, 2016/01/03
- Re: The poor state of documentation of pcase like things., Daniel Colascione, 2016/01/03
- Re: The poor state of documentation of pcase like things., Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/03
- Re: The poor state of documentation of pcase like things., David Kastrup, 2016/01/03
- Re: The poor state of documentation of pcase like things., Dmitry Gutov, 2016/01/03
Re: The poor state of documentation of pcase like things.,
Eli Zaretskii <=