[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no to war in Ukraine
From: |
Jean Louis |
Subject: |
Re: no to war in Ukraine |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Feb 2022 15:43:09 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/2.2.0 (2022-02-12) |
* Yuri Khan <yuri.v.khan@gmail.com> [2022-02-28 15:13]:
> Our [Russian] government does that kind of thing. “This web site here
> has a page that contains banned information. Since TLS protects the
> exact URL from being seen by the Internet provider, we’re going to
> deny you access to the whole site. And if your provider cannot snoop
> SNI, then they can deny you access by IP address, thus including all
> other sites hosted on the same server.” Along the same lines: “KMnO4
> is useful as an antiseptic, but it also can be used to synthesize
> narcotics or explosives, so no, you cannot buy it from your local
> pharmacy.” Basically, prevention of activities that are declared
> unlawful is considered a higher priority than keeping lawful use
> possible, no matter the ratio of harm to usefulness.
Hmm, yes.
Though one can use proxies and VPN, right?
--
Jean
Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns:
https://www.fsf.org/campaigns
In support of Richard M. Stallman
https://stallmansupport.org/
Re: no to war in Ukraine, Alexandre Garreau, 2022/02/28
Re: no to war in Ukraine, Alexandre Garreau, 2022/02/27
Re: no to war in Ukraine, Jean Louis, 2022/02/28
Re: no to war in Ukraine, Yuri Khan, 2022/02/28
Re: no to war in Ukraine, Po Lu, 2022/02/28
Re: no to war in Ukraine, Jean Louis, 2022/02/28