Re: bug#62687: [PATCH] Eglot: eglot--sig-info: Show SigInfo Docs if Markup; fix regex for highlighting; etc

[Corwin Brust]

Hi João,
Nothing wrong with the mailling list AFAIK.

I had understood you two to be talking about connecting more synchronously:

>> Would you like to have an audio-call to talk about the problems
>> related to `eglot--sig-info'? I think it would be much more
>> efficient than email.
>
> I'm on GMT time, but I don't know when I'll be available. Mail me off-list.

You can safely ignore the BBB invite email if you don't need this.
Thanks for your work on org!

Corwin

On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 10:53 AM João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks, but what's wrong with the Emacs bug tracker?  Do we need to
> have a conference to discuss a bug now? :-D
>
> João
>
> On Sun, Apr 9, 2023 at 4:27 PM Corwin Brust <corwin@bru.st> wrote:
> >
> > Hi João and Mekeor,
> >
> > After a brief interaction with Mekeo on IRC, I've created accounts on
> > the EmacsConf BBB for both of you; most welcome to use this for any
> > working sessions.
> >
> > Let me/us know if you didn't get the invites or have any troubles :)
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 4:12 PM João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 8, 2023, 22:04 Mekeor Melire <mekeor@posteo.de> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> 2023-04-08 20:47 joaotavora@gmail.com:
> > >>
> > >> > Mekeor Melire <mekeor@posteo.de> writes:
> > >> >
> > >> > > The main issue is that Eglot won't show the
> > >> > > "SignatureInformation"'s "documentation" field if it is of
> > >> > > type MarkupContent.
> > >> >
> > >> > OK I see it, I understand it, and I've done some changes to
> > >> > master. Please have a look at commit
> > >> > 685435cb52eaa6f61b7088398f1f53e69d76e63e.
> > >>
> > >> Thank you! That commit indeed makes Eglot show
> > >> "SignatureInformation"'s "documentation" field even if it's of
> > >> type MarkupContent. So it solves this main issue.
> > >>
> > >> Unfortunately, that commit causes Eglot to not show the
> > >> "ParameterInformation"'s "documenation" field. I propose to show
> > >> both the SigInfo- and the ParamInfo-documentation, whenever
> > >> possible. (To be more precise: First, the SigInfo-doc should be
> > >> shown, if non-nil. Then, the ParamInfo-doc should be shown, if
> > >> non-nil.) What do you think?
> > >
> > >
> > > Ok, i took it out, because I didn't find any server that used it. Pylsp 
> > > uses it, but the doc is always the empty string. Does your TS server use 
> > > it? Did you get around to providing the event log i asked for?
> > >
> > >> Would you like to have an audio-call to talk about the problems
> > >> related to `eglot--sig-info'? I think it would be much more
> > >> efficient than email.
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm on GMT time, but I don't know when I'll be available. Mail me 
> > > off-list.
> > >
> > > João
>
>
>
> --
> João Távora