Re: [emms-help] about emms-player-finished-hook

[Jorgen Schaefer]

William Xu <address@hidden> writes:

> Maybe emms-next-noerror is *not* "a good function to put in
> `emms-player-finished-hook'." now? I suggest we directly call it after
> emms-player-finished-hook?

Hm. I'd want it to be customizable.

Quick poll:

`emms-player-next-hook' or `emms-player-next-function'?

Regards,
        -- Jorgen

-- 
((email . "address@hidden") (www . "http://www.forcix.cx/";)
 (gpg   . "1024D/028AF63C")   (irc . "nick forcer on IRCnet"))