[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ESPResSo] MMM2D method
From: |
Axel Arnold |
Subject: |
Re: [ESPResSo] MMM2D method |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Feb 2010 16:15:26 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.10.3 (Linux/2.6.27.42-0.1-default; KDE/4.1.3; x86_64; ; ) |
On Tuesday 16 February 2010 00:48:00 Salvador Herrera Velarde wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am using the MMM2D method in a charged system with two wall constraints:
> constraint wall normal 0 0 1 dist 2.5 type 9
> constraint wall normal 0 0 -1 dist 34 type 9
>
> Although the particles remain between the wall-constraints, I am receiving
> the next message: some particles left the assumed slab, precision might be
> lost
The constraints are not the problem, MMM2D basically doesn't see them. What
the error message means, is that during the near formula calcuation, two
particles were further apart in z than L_y/2, which should not happen. While
tuning, MMM2D actually checks that your layers are defined such that cannot
occur. So, somehow the box geometry for MMM2D after tuning changes, which it
should be able to handle, but apparently isn't. Can you send me your script?
Then I can try to figure out why.
Regarding how big the errors can be: that depends highly on |z|. There is a
small gap until which the losses are negligible, but very quickly the
Bernoulli sum in the near formula will be outside its convergence radius, and
then the errors are disastrous (that is, can be in the order of 10^5 easily).
Axel
--
Dr. Axel Arnold Tel: +49 711 685 63593
ICP, Universität Stuttgart Email: address@hidden
Pfaffenwaldring 27
70569 Stuttgart, Germany