[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request
From: |
tps12 |
Subject: |
Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Aug 2003 06:35:46 -0400 (EDT) |
Gotcha. I don't think a single person should be able to prevent somebody
from speaking in their games. That's a community decision, after all.
> But....
>
> Let me come at this another way.
>
> When I censor someone, what I'm doing is saying "I
> don't care about the rest of you, but I want to ignore
> this person." It's a personal decision (a personal
> FREEDOM, you might say).
>
> When I hit their gojo, I'm saying something different.
> Now I'm saying "I don't want this person in this
> room." In a way, it isn't about me at all. I'm
> making a (small piece of a) community-level decision.
>
>
> I think the first, censoring, is a less drastic
> action. For one thing, it doesn't affect the censored
> person at all. IMO, people should try (individually)
> censoring before voting to ban. And a stalkee should
> always have the option of censoring someone they think
> is bothering them.
>
> I just realized that maybe this is a semantic error.
> When I say "censor", I mean "/ignore".
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, (continued)
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/06
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request,
tps12 <=
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, Desired Username, 2003/08/07
- Re: [Fgs-bs] F*ETURE request, tps12, 2003/08/07