[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Findutils-patches] [PATCH] bug 20273

From: James Youngman
Subject: Re: [Findutils-patches] [PATCH] bug 20273
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:47:24 +0100

On 6/27/07, Eric Blake-1 <address@hidden> wrote:

OK to apply?


The bulk of the patch is a new test in the testsuite,
which required some tweaks to get xargs_start to run a subshell
with multiple commands, rather than just xargs.  I then validated
that the new test fails prior to the xargs.c changes and passes
afterwards on the Linux machine where I originally reported the bug.


Should I use the name savannah-20273, or sv-bug-20273 (both
naming formats are in use in the xargs testsuite)?

I think I normally use the latter, but it's not a big deal.

Since this is a bug fix, is it worth backporting this to the
4.2 branch?

Yes, I think it's worthwhile.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]