[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [fluid-dev] FluidSynth and glib

From: Ryan Gonzalez
Subject: Re: [fluid-dev] FluidSynth and glib
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:06:33 -0600

Well, the majority of g_* are wrapped with macros anyway, so it wouldn't be a major issue.

Would the developers of Fluidsynth be OK if I sent a series of patches to this list that slowly eliminated the need for glib? Unless you have another way of handling contributions or something....

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Kjetil Matheussen <address@hidden> wrote:

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Ryan Gonzalez <address@hidden> wrote:

Similar things for the rest of them. This doesn't seem TOO bad...

Maybe it would be a good idea to just implement the necessary
"g_"* functions for the needed platforms instead of creating a new API
doing all of these things?

fluid-dev mailing list

[ERROR]: Your autotools build scripts are 200 lines longer than your program. Something’s wrong.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]