RE: [FR-devel] how to test accessor methods (an opinion forDumbTestBuilder)

[Curt Hibbs]

gabriele renzi wrote:

[snip]

> and this will work fine..
>
> BTW, this code would be of little help:
>  setup() could fail the creation of class instances,
>  accessor=(tmp) could cause an exception
> and, most important,
> if accessor=() and accessor() are explicitly coded  it
> is quite sure that the input for accessor=() would be
> mangled someway, and thus the test would fail..
>
>
> Should I add this facility?
> should I put empty setup() and teardown() methods
> anyway in the code?

I would just put empty setup and teardown methods with a comment in the body
that says something like "insert code here"

Curt