[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Devel] broken binary compatibility
From: |
Anthony Fok |
Subject: |
Re: [Devel] broken binary compatibility |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Jul 2002 12:48:35 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
Well, as a Debian and ThizLinux (deb/rpm) packager, I see both approaches
used by different upstream authors quite often, and we adapt to both, so we
use either
make install prefix=/destination/directory/usr
or
make install DESTDIR=/destination/directory
But yes, if we standardize on having DESTDIR available, that would be nice
too, as the "prefix=/destination/directory/usr" approach doesn't work for
installating files to the /etc and /var directories. :-)
Cheers,
Anthony
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:42:09AM +0200, Arkadiusz Miskiewicz wrote:
> Werner LEMBERG <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > > Also DESTDIR patch to allow make install DESTDIR=/tmp/somewhere
> >
> > This is already available:
> >
> > configure --prefix=/tmp/somewhere
> No. This is not the same. DESTDIR is _only_ for installation
> in different directory than default. These (DESTDIR and prefix)
> are different things. You can have
> configure --prefix=/blabla1/ --includedir=/otherblabla2/ \
> --libdir=/blabla3/ and so on and these paths
> are used at compilation time, too.
>
> With DESTDIR you only do:
> make install DESTDIR=/here/is/some/strange/location.
>
> ps. DESTDIR is default thing in automake generated makefiles.
--
Anthony Fok Tung-Ling
ThizLinux Laboratory <address@hidden> http://www.thizlinux.com/
Debian Chinese Project <address@hidden> http://www.debian.org/intl/zh/
Come visit Our Lady of Victory Camp! http://www.olvc.ab.ca/