[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Devel] [Fwd: Re: [Pfaedit-devel] bdf to pcf conversion]
From: |
George Williams |
Subject: |
Re: [Devel] [Fwd: Re: [Pfaedit-devel] bdf to pcf conversion] |
Date: |
05 May 2004 20:20:55 -0700 |
On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 19:55, Keith Packard wrote:
> Nope, at least not in the current implementation anywhere. You could
> extend PCF if you like; the format does permit new tables.
Thanks. That's what I thought. I don't believe that I'll extend it but
Scot's group may do so if they wish.
> Does TrueType SFNT format support this?
Yes, in the EBLC/bloc table, in the bitmapSizeTable there is a bitDepth
field and a color table field. If color table is 0, values for bitdepth
are:
1 (bitmap)
Apple documents
2,4,8,16,24 (grey scale)
OpenType documents
2,4,8 (grey scale)
OpenType recommends bitDepth=1 or 8
The meaning of colour table field is undocumented, but Apple mutters
about coloured fonts in spite of that.
I don't know that I've seen any real-world examples...
> PCF is evil in any case -- it has a flat encoding vector, which ends up
> rather large for essentially all Unicode fonts.
:-) >I< wasn't intending to use it
Thanks Keith.