[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft-devel] Re: const problems

From: Kirill Smelkov
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Re: const problems
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 11:57:38 +0400
User-agent: KMail/1.5.1


7 Июнь 2005 17:54, Вы написали:
> > - I have no problem with introducing 'const' in 2.2.0.
> >
> > - I also think that keeping the non-constness of the
> >   current 2.1.x line is _not_ a big problem.
> >
> > - I don't want a FT_CONST macro in the next release,
> >   (2.1.10). That's ugly as hell, and the kind of
> >   "temporary" band-aid that will haunt us for a very
> >   long time
> OK, I postpone the `const' thing in callback functions after the
> release of 2.1.10.  Sorry, Kirill.

Oh, let it be. That's ok with me.

At the very least i can maintain my own patches until 2.1.10 is released.

To clarify things I have to ask you:
1. Will ft-constify.patches be accepted after 2.1.10 is out?
2. What time 2.1.10 is going to be released?

Hope to hear from you,


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]