[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and
RE: [ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES and FT_CONFIG_OPTION_NO_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES
Fri, 3 Aug 2007 14:56:44 +0100
I'll prepare a patch if I have time, and indeed install GNU diff if I can
find it and understand yet another utility... but it's a miracle I have time
to post anything back to the FreeType list actually. Personally I find
narrative interspersed with snippets easier to follow than diff runes, but
my mileage not only varies but is obviously widely divergent and possibly
even perpendicular to other peoples'.
But I remain, as for a decade now, in your debt as a grateful FreeType user.
From: Werner LEMBERG [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: 03 August 2007 12:02
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] we don't need both FT_CONFIG_OPTION_POSTSCRIPT_NAMES
> > > And - one other thing - we need to enclose the whole of
> > > pstables.h in
> > >
> > > #ifdef FT_CONFIG_OPTION_ADOBE_GLYPH_LIST ... #endif
> > This is not correct. For example, ft_standard_glyph_names is used
> > in ps_get_macintosh_name which is not within the scope of the
> > abovementioned macro.
> Okay - but I suggest that we need (or is there already?) a macro to
> prevent compilation of these large tables, which are about 60K in
> size, when they are not needed.
Please prepare a patch -- there are other #ifdefs there which could be
used to limit the scope.
PS: BTW, what about installing GNU diff on your platform? This would
*greatly* simplify your reports.