[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Nov 2010 07:47:16 +0100 (CET) |
> Shaded areas "Before" and "After" in the attached figures show where
> control points have should be to permit flattening. Is this a risky
> change? If anything, it is slightly more conservative, yet the
> conditional is quite a bit simpler.
Uh, oh, I have no idea what you are talking about. Please provide
more context, especially the formulae you are referring to. It would
also help if you use lines to connect the control points in the image.
Werner
- [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/11/08
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, GRAHAM ASHER, 2010/11/09
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/11/10
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/11/11
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- RE: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, David Bevan, 2010/11/12
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/11/12
- RE: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, David Bevan, 2010/11/12
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, GRAHAM ASHER, 2010/11/12
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/11/12
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Алексей Подтележников, 2010/11/12
- Re: [ft-devel] cubic clean up, Behdad Esfahbod, 2010/11/12