[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ft-devel] Re: [Fontforge-devel] Fwd: Possible FontForge (and FreeType)
From: |
James Cloos |
Subject: |
[ft-devel] Re: [Fontforge-devel] Fwd: Possible FontForge (and FreeType) OTF issues |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Mar 2011 06:28:09 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110014 (No Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>> FontForge itself seems to have a built-in max of 42 CID sub-fonts:
>>> the pull-down menu under CID displays at most 42 (in builds of
>>> 20090224 and 20100501; not sure about the current source, since I'm
>>> still trying to get it to build on Mac OS X 10.6.6).
I just took a look through (git grep makes is easy) and saw no instances
of static allocation of the subfont structures in fontforge; everything
is allocated dynamically.
Looking at the Reader9 versions of the fonts you mentioned, I get:
>>> AdobeHeitiStd-Regular.otf
Version 5.04 has 10 subfamilies
>>> AdobeSongStd-Light.otf
Version 5.02 has 10 subfamilies
>>> AdobeFangsongStd-Regular.otf
>>> AdobeKaitiStd-Regular.otf
these are not included.
The 10 subfamilies matches the number of FontName entries ttx shows in
the CFF table.
For Heiti, in fontforge I see 28931 glyphs between Hanzi and Yi. I
didn't count the eight small subfamilies, but that looks like a good
match for the 30009 unique cidNNNNNs ttx says are in the cmap table.
Is there an example of a font with more than 42 subfonts?
I tested with ff 20100501, gentoo amd64 compile.
-JimC
--
James Cloos <address@hidden> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6