[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft-devel] Registration of a set of trickyfonts by NEC

From: suzuki toshiya
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Registration of a set of trickyfonts by NEC
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 20:59:07 +0900
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird (X11/20080406)

Just I've uploaded an archive:

it includes following files:
* LiberationSerif-Regular.ttf - a free font including cvt/fpgm/prep tables
* LiberationSerif.odt - an ODT document referring LiberationSerif font
* LiberationSerif-OO3.pdf - a PDF generated by LibreOffice 3.3.1
  to be precisely, OOO330m19 (Build:8) tagged libreoffice-, Debian 
package (1:3.3.1-1)
* embedded-font.pdf - subsetted & embedded font in the PDF

I think this is not Debian specific issue, but reporting the issue by
Debian binary to LibreOffice official maintainers won't be welcomed.
I will make more official style report for their official bugzilla.
But I have to work with other issues before it...


address@hidden wrote:
> Yes, I should file the bug with yet another sample
> with free fonts (NEC FA-xxx fonts are proprietary)
> including the clarification you commented.
> Regards,
> mpsuzuki
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:23:32 +0900
> Miles Bader <address@hidden> wrote:
>> suzuki toshiya <address@hidden> writes:
>>> BTW, during the production of sample PDF, I found that
>>> generates wrong checksum for embedded TTF,
>>> so the tricky font detection by the checksum cannot solve
>>> the problem :-(
>> Could you compare against _both_ the real checksum and the bogus
>> checksum, and recognize both?  [Maybe just add separate
>> entries for the "bogus version" of these fonts...]
>> -Miles
> _______________________________________________
> Freetype-devel mailing list
> address@hidden

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]