[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] truetype metrics resize request question
From: |
Steven Chu |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] truetype metrics resize request question |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Jul 2011 03:41:17 -0500 |
For reference if anyone is curious, any pixel size that is not a
multiple of 5 will exhibit the problem. A couple common ones are 72px
and 96px which should be a 72x72 and 96x96 respectively. Leading is 0
for Ahem so height should be ascent+descent.
72px
Before
Ascender: 3712 Descender: -960 >> Height: 4672 == 73px
After
Ascender: 3712 Descender: -896 >> Height: 4608 == 72px
96px
Before
Ascender: 4928 Descender: -1280 >> Height: 6208 == 97px
After
Ascender: 4928 Descender: -1216 >> Height: 6144 == 96px
>
>> I've made a patch for the proposed change below. Please let me know
>> if anything needs to be adjusted.
>
> The patch looks good, thanks. Just for the record, please give some
> numeric values for your problem with the Ahem font so that I can
> identify and handle potential issues in the future more easily.
>
>
> Werner
>
- [ft-devel] truetype metrics resize request question, Steven Chu, 2011/07/10
- Re: [ft-devel] truetype metrics resize request question, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/07/10
- Message not available
- Re: [ft-devel] truetype metrics resize request question, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/07/11
- Re: [ft-devel] truetype metrics resize request question, Steven Chu, 2011/07/11
- Re: [ft-devel] truetype metrics resize request question, Steven Chu, 2011/07/11
- Re: [ft-devel] truetype metrics resize request question, Steven Chu, 2011/07/13
- Re: [ft-devel] truetype metrics resize request question, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/07/14
- Re: [ft-devel] truetype metrics resize request question,
Steven Chu <=
- Re: [ft-devel] truetype metrics resize request question, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/07/16
- Re: [ft-devel] truetype metrics resize request question, Алексей Подтележников, 2011/07/24
- Re: [ft-devel] truetype metrics resize request question, Werner LEMBERG, 2011/07/28