freetype-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF


From: suzuki toshiya
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 11:12:27 +0900
User-agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080406)

Just I've checked Adobe Reader 5.0 on Mac OS X 10.3,
it displays the text (as attached picture).
However, it makes Preview.app (2.1.0 v211) crashed.
Also, font previewer of Mac OS X 10.3 does not show
anything for test.otf.

Should I ask Adobe experts about if this is a regression,
or, appropriate behaviour to prevent some vulnerability
issue?

Regards,
mpsuzuki

suzuki toshiya wrote:
> Sorry, I don't have working older Acrobat in my hand.
> Could you post screenshots if possible?
> 
> Regards,
> mpsuzuki
> 
> Ivan Nincic wrote:
>> Hi Suzuki, 
>> I think the font may have worked for older Acrobat Reader versions. 
>> IvanN
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: suzuki toshiya [mailto:address@hidden 
>> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 5:42 AM
>> To: Werner LEMBERG
>> Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden
>> Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF
>>
>> Another followup for the standard behaviour.
>> Although Adobe Acrobat 9 on Microsoft Windows does not show any glyphs for
>> sample PDF, sample OTF can be browsed by fontview.exe (on Microsoft Windows
>> XP SP2).
>>
>> Regards,
>> mpsuzuki
>>
>> suzuki toshiya wrote (2012/04/14 21:23):
>>> Ah, I slipped to check what is the standard behaviour, thank you.
>>> I got same results on Adobe Acrobat 9 on Microsft Windows and Preview 
>>> (5.0.3) on Mac OS X.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> mpsuzuki
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: suzuki toshiya [mailto:address@hidden 
>> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 2:00 AM
>> To: address@hidden
>> Cc: address@hidden
>> Subject: Re: [ft-devel] Regression issue - CFF
>>
>> It seems that bb211ce6ce7f712e4cc4423e93c6c13780122512
>> (2011-09-07, between 2.4.6 and 2.4.7) relates this change of the behaviour.
>> The changeset was introduced to fix savannah bug #33816. I should take a
>> look more in detail and think how to fix both issues.
>>
>> Regards,
>> mpsuzuki
>>
>> suzuki toshiya wrote:
>>> I will check which changeset relates this difference.
>>>
>>> Ivan Nincic wrote:
>>>> Hello Werner,
>>>>
>>>> FYI: I run into a regression issue with the latest FT (trunk) version.
>>>> Attached is a sample font. I don't claim that this is a valid font 
>>>> however FT was able to render the file in 2.4.4 but not in 2.4.9.
>>>>
>>>> IvanN
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Freetype-devel mailing list
>>>> address@hidden
>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freetype-devel mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Freetype-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]