[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine
From: |
James Cloos |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine |
Date: |
Thu, 02 May 2013 12:07:20 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
I noticed in ftview that, as 24 ppem, the baselines and the xheight of
any glyph with a round baseline are one pixel lower than the other
glyphs when using the Adobe engine.
Toggling forced autohint after switching to the Adobe engine makes the
issue very obvious.
I'm at commit 2048f02e15d658517f23ad2493b7ee53b72c605a.
-JimC
--
James Cloos <address@hidden> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, (continued)
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2013/05/11
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/11
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/11
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Dave Arnold, 2013/05/11
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Nikolaus Waxweiler, 2013/05/12
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Vernon Adams, 2013/05/12
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, octoploid, 2013/05/12
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Vernon Adams, 2013/05/12
Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine,
James Cloos <=
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/02
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/02
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Ross Lagerwall, 2013/05/02
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/02
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Ross Lagerwall, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, octoploid, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, Werner LEMBERG, 2013/05/03
- Re: [ft-devel] new CFF engine, octoploid, 2013/05/03