[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] FT_MulDiv optimization
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] FT_MulDiv optimization |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Jul 2014 07:42:51 +0200 (CEST) |
> Ok. I improved the comment. The Taylor expansion was not appropriate
> there.
Thanks.
> Now the big question is if we should go 64-bit always when it is
> available. We do so right now. The above check for 32-bit is cheap,
> while 64-bit division is very, very, very expensive.
Hmm. What do you suggest?
Werner
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MulDiv optimization, (continued)
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MulDiv optimization, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2014/07/04
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MulDiv optimization, Behdad Esfahbod, 2014/07/04
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MulDiv optimization, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2014/07/04
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MulDiv optimization, Behdad Esfahbod, 2014/07/04
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MulDiv optimization, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/07/04
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MulDiv optimization, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2014/07/04
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MulDiv optimization, Werner LEMBERG, 2014/07/05
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MulDiv optimization, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2014/07/05
- Re: [ft-devel] FT_MulDiv optimization,
Werner LEMBERG <=