[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ft-devel] integer suffix abuse

From: Alexei Podtelezhnikov
Subject: Re: [ft-devel] integer suffix abuse
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 14:36:37 -0400

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Tom Bishop, Wenlin Institute
<address@hidden> wrote:
> I would have guessed that with a 64-bit compiler the resulting executable 
> code would be the same with or without L. (The definitions of types like 
> FT_Fixed and FT_Long would make more difference.) Surprisingly, changing all 
> 0x10000L to 0x10000 in FreetypeAmalgam.c really does produce a few different 
> assembly language instructions (using Xcode). (See below for the diff.)

That is reassuring. 64-bit gcc produces exact same code with and
without L in large numbers. Can you regenerate unified diff (-u) so
that we can see line numbers?

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]