|
From: | suzuki toshiya |
Subject: | Re: [ft-devel] Font that freetype doesn't want to open |
Date: | Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:28:16 +0900 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) |
Albert Astals Cid wrote::
El Dilluns, 21 de setembre de 2015, a les 13:32:18, suzuki toshiya va escriure:However, I don't know how Adobe Reader handles a PDF including such font. Yet I'm not sure whether FreeType2 should care, or, poppler should, but, if Adobe Reader opens it without any font substitution, some fallback should be considered. Where can I obtain a sample PDF?If the font is "unfixable", i guess FreeType is doing the correct thing and just failing, i thought poppler had a "if freetype fails try to get a font from fontconfig", but i'm either wrong or there's a bug in that codepath.File can be obtained at https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92017
Thanks, I found that Adobe Reader complains the embedded font, and the most texts of the PDF are not displayed at all (maybe no fallback). The bug submitter compares Okular and Google Chrome and maybe thinks Google Chrome loads the incompletely-embedded font. Should I check how Google Chrome fix this problem? Regards, mpsuzuki
Cheers, AlbertRegards, mpsuzuki Werner LEMBERG wrote:(this is tracing data from the current FreeType git version).So you're saying we should try to load some other substitute font if we encounter the font that i sent in the first email, right?Yes, since the font is broken and can't be sanitized by FreeType. Werner _______________________________________________ Freetype-devel mailing list address@hidden https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/freetype-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |