[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [ft-devel] LD version script
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: [ft-devel] LD version script |
Date: |
Fri, 02 Feb 2018 07:40:37 +0100 (CET) |
> Again, the symbol versioning does not improve performance, the
> attribute does.
Yep. However, the benefits for FreeType are rather small, I believe,
since the number of library functions is small.
> I am attaching my slightly updated script. We need to discuss the
> tag, FREETYPE or FT or FreeType if it is legal.
The script works fine, thanks! Whom could we ask which the tag prefix
is valid?
> I will work on -fvisibility=hidden support through AC_TRY_COMPILE.
Thanks.
Werner
- Re: [ft-devel] LD version script, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/02/01
- Re: [ft-devel] LD version script, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2018/02/01
- Re: [ft-devel] LD version script,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: [ft-devel] LD version script, Tom Kacvinsky, 2018/02/02
- Re: [ft-devel] LD version script, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/02/03
- Re: [ft-devel] LD version script, Tom Kacvinsky, 2018/02/03
- Re: [ft-devel] LD version script, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/02/03
- Re: [ft-devel] LD version script, Tom Kacvinsky, 2018/02/03
- Re: [ft-devel] LD version script, Tom Kacvinsky, 2018/02/03
- Re: [ft-devel] LD version script, Werner LEMBERG, 2018/02/06
- Re: [ft-devel] LD version script, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2018/02/02