[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FT Performance Regression?
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: FT Performance Regression? |
Date: |
Sat, 26 Oct 2019 17:54:53 +0200 (CEST) |
> FreeType 2.6 used to use an unbounded clip_box in the
> FT_Raster_Params struct, and internally the gray_compute_cbox
> function would clamp it to a reasonable range.
>
> That clamping no longer happens, so you have to do it yourself
> before calling the function. The docs don't really explain how that
> would be calculated, but from looking at the old 2.6 code I think it
> should be this:
>
> FT_Outline_Get_CBox(outline, &rp.clip_box);
> rp.clip_box.xMin = rp.clip_box.xMin >> 6;
> rp.clip_box.yMin = rp.clip_box.yMin >> 6;
> rp.clip_box.xMax = (rp.clip_box.xMax + 63) >> 6;
> rp.clip_box.yMax = (rp.clip_box.yMax + 63) >> 6;
>
> Does that seem correct?
Alexei?
Werner
- [ft] FT Performance Regression?, Jamie Dale, 2019/10/24
- Re: [ft] FT Performance Regression?, Jamie Dale, 2019/10/24
- Re: [ft] FT Performance Regression?, Jamie Dale, 2019/10/24
- Re: FT Performance Regression?, Jamie Dale, 2019/10/25
- Re: FT Performance Regression?, Jamie Dale, 2019/10/25
- Re: FT Performance Regression?,
Werner LEMBERG <=
- Re: FT Performance Regression?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2019/10/26
- Re: FT Performance Regression?, Jamie Dale, 2019/10/27
- Re: FT Performance Regression?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2019/10/27
- Re: FT Performance Regression?, Jamie Dale, 2019/10/27
- Re: FT Performance Regression?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2019/10/27
- Re: FT Performance Regression?, Jamie Dale, 2019/10/27
- Re: FT Performance Regression?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2019/10/27
- Re: FT Performance Regression?, Jamie Dale, 2019/10/27
- Re: FT Performance Regression?, Alexei Podtelezhnikov, 2019/10/27