[Fsfe-france] [Fwd: <nettime> WSJ: Can Copyright Be Saved?]

[lagadu]

En écho aux interrogations passées sur la nécessité ou non de s'opposer aux
DRM ou d'y contribuer en  libre.
Quelques éléments basiques de réflexion

chris

Heiko Recktenwald wrote:

> The subject reminds me to my slogan: Save copyright, fight DRM.
>
> Copyright nd DRM are two completely different things anyway. Copyright is
> something human, a social something, DRM is technic. Copyright has
> exeptions and an end, DRM not. DRM kills copyright as a social thing, DRM
> is just tyranny. The main point is: You cannot obey the law if you cant
> break it, if you cant break it, thats DRM, the law just disappears.
>
> It is a strange optic to say the digital times kill copyright. They have
> made copying just easier. A lot of people used Napster etc, but not all.
>
> And so on. Nothing against creative commons, it is just another use of
> copyright.
>
> H.
>
> #  distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission
> #  <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
> #  collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
> #  more info: address@hidden and "info nettime-l" in the msg body
> #  archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: address@hidden

--
"On est soit du côté du problème, soit du côté de la solution". U.M.M.