[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fsfe-france] RE: RE: Déformation de vos pr opos dans l'interview du Jou

From: Paul Van den Bulck
Subject: [Fsfe-france] RE: RE: Déformation de vos pr opos dans l'interview du Journal du Net
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:11:51 +0100

Réponse rapide :

Voy. notamment Christophe Carron, Prof paris XII : "Les licences de logiciels 
dits libres à l'épreuve du droit  d'auteur français", Dalloz, 2003, chron, 1556.

Bien à vous 

Paul Van den Bulck
> Avocat - Advocaat- Attorney at law
Chargé d'enseignement à l'Université R. Schuman (Strasbourg)

Avenue de la Couronne 224
1050 Brussels
tel. +32 (0)2 340 88 10
fax +32 (0)2 345 35 80

Ulys is certified ISO 9001 : version 2000

Member of EUROJURIS - www.eurojuris.net
International Network of Law Firms

This electronic message transmission contains information which may be 
confidential or privileged. The information is intended to be for the use of 
the individual or entity named above.  If you are not the intended recipient,be 
aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this 
information is prohibited.  If you have received this electronic transmission 
in error, please notify us by telephone or by electronic mail immediately.

-----Original Message-----
From: Loic Dachary [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: jeudi 25 novembre 2004 15:10
To: Paul Van den Bulck
Cc: address@hidden; Fabrice Deblock (E-mail)
Subject: Re: RE: Déformation de vos propos dans l'interview du Journal
du Net 

Paul Van den Bulck writes:
 > Je vous remercie pour votre mail. Les propos relatés par Mr Deblock
 > sont corrects.  En réalité je fais référence à l'article 2 de la
 > convention GPL.  

        Je suis troublé et je ne comprends plus. Voulez-vous dire que
l'article 2 de la GNU GPL contient une aberration juridique ?
Pouvez-vous m'indiquer, dans l'article 2 ci dessous, ce qui relève
selon vous de l'aberration juridique ? A ma connaissance il ne se
trouve pas aujourd'hui de juriste pour défendre cela, mais je peux me
tromper. Si c'est le cas je vous remercie de me fournir les références
précises de l'article ou de l'ouvrage afin que je puisse lire leur

        Merci par avance,

  2. You may modify your copy or copies of the Program or any portion
of it, thus forming a work based on the Program, and copy and
distribute such modifications or work under the terms of Section 1
above, provided that you also meet all of these conditions:

    a) You must cause the modified files to carry prominent notices
    stating that you changed the files and the date of any change.

    b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in
    whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any
    part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third
    parties under the terms of this License.

    c) If the modified program normally reads commands interactively
    when run, you must cause it, when started running for such
    interactive use in the most ordinary way, to print or display an
    announcement including an appropriate copyright notice and a
    notice that there is no warranty (or else, saying that you provide
    a warranty) and that users may redistribute the program under
    these conditions, and telling the user how to view a copy of this
    License.  (Exception: if the Program itself is interactive but
    does not normally print such an announcement, your work based on
    the Program is not required to print an announcement.)

These requirements apply to the modified work as a whole.  If
identifiable sections of that work are not derived from the Program,
and can be reasonably considered independent and separate works in
themselves, then this License, and its terms, do not apply to those
sections when you distribute them as separate works.  But when you
distribute the same sections as part of a whole which is a work based
on the Program, the distribution of the whole must be on the terms of
this License, whose permissions for other licensees extend to the
entire whole, and thus to each and every part regardless of who wrote it.

Thus, it is not the intent of this section to claim rights or contest
your rights to work written entirely by you; rather, the intent is to
exercise the right to control the distribution of derivative or
collective works based on the Program.

In addition, mere aggregation of another work not based on the Program
with the Program (or with a work based on the Program) on a volume of
a storage or distribution medium does not bring the other work under
the scope of this License.

Donate to FSF France online : http://rate.affero.net/fsffrance/
Loic Dachary, 12 bd Magenta, 75010 Paris. Tel: 33 1 42 45 07 97      
http://www.fsffrance.org/   http://www.dachary.org/loic/gpg.txt

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]