[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib
From: |
Rob Browning |
Subject: |
Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 15:48:18 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:
>> The base-0 revisions are both just the 1.3.4 source with a few minor
>> (arch-related) modifications.
>>
> I hope you branched main--1.4 from main-dev--0...
Yes, exactly.
tla archive-setup g-wrap--main--1.4
tla tag g-wrap--main-dev--0--base-0 g-wrap--main--1.4
If that's not right, just let me know. It'd still be easy to start
over ATM.
>> My current plan is to keep savannah CVS around, but try having it be
>> read-only, and only follow g-wrap--main-dev via sync from the main
>> arch tree -- hence the .cvsignore files in the arch repo.
>>
> I follow the following policy: Make .cvsignore files an exception
> (i.e. allow writes) and keep them out of the arch repo. Having them in
> the arch repo doesn't hurt, though.
Hadn't thought about that. Guess that would have been fine too,
though I wonder if dir rearrangements might be easier if all mods are
done from arch (w/the .cvsignore files stored there)...
> Hmm, is there even supposed to be a way to upload using rsync/sftp?
> I haven't seen any docs about that.
Yeah, there's some info, including this bit in the admin docs:
Check the CVS page for detailed instruction. Here are three example
commands to upload a file in your public download area:
rsync --rsh=ssh distribution.tar.gz \
address@hidden:/upload/g-wrapg-wrap
sftp -1 address@hidden:/g-wrap
scp distribution.tar.gz address@hidden:/upload/g-wrapg-wrap
but these don't seem to work, and I suppose they might be vestigal.
I've seen several relevant bits of "file section" documentation, but
I'm not sure they were all consistent. In any case, I'll go back and
re-check the info I was given when savannah came back up. I had
thought that FTP+GPG was planned, but not available yet, but maybe I'm
misremembering.
In general, am I right in presuming that making the arch repo
publically available, even if only read-only should help a lot,
(i.e. making it possible to generate changesets, etc.), and that
if/when I'm ready to make it read-write, I can do that via various
methods, including tla-pqm (which I'm not familar with yet)?
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
- Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib, Andy Wingo, 2004/01/16
- Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/01/16
- Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib, Rob Browning, 2004/01/16
- Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/01/16
- Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib,
Rob Browning <=
- Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/01/16
- Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib, Rob Browning, 2004/01/16
- Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/01/16
- Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib, Rob Browning, 2004/01/16
- Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib, Rob Browning, 2004/01/18
- Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib, Andreas Rottmann, 2004/01/18
- Re: Ripping out GLib bindings, depending on GLib, Rob Browning, 2004/01/18