Re: G-Wrap, helping out on the G2 port

[Derek Atkins]

Andreas Rottmann <address@hidden> writes:

>> "depend on", yes.  But I'd like to reduce the dependency.  Right now
>> gnucash is way too closely tied to guile.  I'd like to change that.
>>
> Do you have any details on how this is going to happen (esp. how it
> will affect the bindings/wrapping stuff)?

Honestly, I don't know.  I'd like to remove the "separate bindings"
file if possible -- or be capable of building multiple bindings for
different languages from a single configuration (bindings for guile,
perl, etc.).

What I really want to do, however, is revert GnuCash back into a C App
(instead of a guile script), and hopefully reduce the number of
loadable modules supplied.  I'd also like to reduce the amount of
gnucash code that calls out to scheme and then back into gnucash, but
I'm not exactly sure what the right way to do that is, yet.

-derek
-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       address@hidden                        PGP key available