[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules
From: |
Andrew Cagney |
Subject: |
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:02:56 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD macppc; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030820 |
Andrew Cagney <address@hidden> writes:
Significantly, this dynamic is often absent in open groups. Typically
an "area maintainer" title serves no real purpose other than to provide
a fast-path for that individual's (or their employeers) changes. The
mutual obligation of ensuring that patches are resolved, and
development continues a pace being absent. That responsibility instead
falls to the groups core developers.
...
Since Cygnus was dominating development, and had most of the GDB
developers on their payroll (at that time it including me), and to
this day "Cygnus" still has the largest single block of devlopers, it
had to be clear that no core developer, nor I as overall lead
developer could override an area lead's decision (if we disagreed we
had to present a pervasive technical argument).
Andrew, I'm having a hard time working out precisely what you are
saying, so, just to be crystal clear: do you object to that part of
the proposed change in the e-mail from Kevin Buettner, to wit, that
any global maintainer may approve any patch, even to an area which has
an area maintainer?
I'm trying to compare the two systems, and note the benefits offered by
the current GDB.
At present I, along with the other core maintainers, clearly defer to
specific maintainer when it comes to a technical decision (or patch
approval) in that area. There is certainly latitude in this - the more
experienced you are the more broad the "obvious" definition becomes.
The benefit here is that it provides greater level of even handedness
which is very important in areas where GDB interfaces to the user -
(eli always keeps us honest) CLI (Fernando is dadly missed), and even
less obvious user interfaces such as the remote protocol.
In GCC, on the other hand, global developers are able to directly, and
immedatly approve patches - without any need to defer or refer to the
relevant maintainer. I suspect, however, that there is something of an
unwritten convention?
Also as I mentioned, in the case of the TUI, core maintainers, do still
have blanket write (but it is mentioned explicitly) - hmm, I'm
attatching the bulk of the maintainers file, my original quote could be
read as out-of-context - you can even think of this as making GDB a
superset of GCC.
Either way, the thing to study, is what happens when things go wrong.
In GCC, people complain, and the global maintainers step in.
In GDB, people complain, and unfortunatly, there's no short term relief
valve - [typically] I pester the area developer and often I'll end up
helping out short term (fine with me). A more automatic mechanism might
be of benefit here.
Andrew
GDB Maintainers
Global Maintainers
(alphabetic)
Jim Blandy jimb@
Kevin Buettner kevinb@
Andrew Cagney ac131313@
J.T. Conklin jtc@
Fred Fish fnf@
Daniel Jacobowitz dan@
Mark Kettenis kettenis@
Peter Schauer Peter.Schauer@
Stan Shebs shebs@
Michael Snyder msnyder@
Elena Zannoni ezannoni@
Eli Zaretskii eliz@
Various Maintainers
Note individuals who maintain parts of the debugger need approval to
check in changes outside of the immediate domain that they maintain.
If there is no maintainer for a given domain then the responsibility
falls to a global maintainer.
If there are several maintainers for a given domain then
responsibility falls to the first maintainer. The first maintainer is
free to devolve that responsibility among the other maintainers.
The Obvious Fix Rule
All maintainers listed in this file are allowed to check in obvious
fixes.
An "obvious fix" means that there is no possibility that anyone will
disagree with the change.
A good mental test is "will the person who hates my work the most be
able to find fault with the change" - if so, then it's not obvious and
needs to be posted first. :-)
Something like changing or bypassing an interface is _not_ an obvious
fix, since such a change without discussion will result in
instantaneous and loud complaints.
Target Instruction Set Architectures:
Generic ISA (Instruction Set Architecture) issues, API variants, CPU
variants. *-tdep.c. The Target/Architecture maintainer works with the
host maintainer when resolving build issues. The Target/Architecture
maintainer works with the native maintainer when resolving API issues.
a29k Deleted.
alpha --target=alpha-elf ,-Werror
Maintenance only
arc Deleted.
arm --target=arm-elf ,-Werror
Scott Bambrough scottb@
Richard Earnshaw rearnsha@
avr --target=avr ,-Werror
Theodore A. Roth troth@
cris --target=cris-elf ,-Werror
Orjan Friberg orjanf@
d10v --target=d10v-elf ,-Werror
Maintenance only
d30v Deleted.
fr30 Deleted.
frv --target=frv-elf ,-Werror
Maintenance only
h8300 --target=h8300hms ,-Werror
Maintenance only
h8500 Deleted.
i386 --target=i386-elf ,-Werror
Mark Kettenis kettenis@
i960 Deleted.
ia64 --target=ia64-linux-gnu ,-Werror
(--target=ia64-elf broken)
Kevin Buettner kevinb@
m32r --target=m32r-elf ,-Werror
m68hc11 --target=m68hc11-elf ,-Werror ,
Stephane Carrez stcarrez@
m68k --target=m68k-elf ,-Werror
Maintenance only
m88k Deleted.
mcore --target=mcore-elf ,-Werror
Maintenance only
mips --target=mips-elf ,-Werror
Andrew Cagney cagney@
mn10200 Deleted.
mn10300 --target=mn10300-elf ,-Werror
Maintenance only
ns32k --target=ns32k-netbsd ,-Werror
Maintenance only
pa (--target=hppa-elf broken)
Maintenance only
powerpc --target=powerpc-eabi ,-Werror
Kevin Buettner kevinb@
s390 --target=s390-linux-gnu ,-Werror
(contact DJ Barrow djbarrow@
sh --target=sh-elf ,-Werror
Elena Zannoni ezannoni@
sparc --target=sparc-elf ,-Werror
Maintenance only
tic80 Deleted.
v850 --target=v850-elf ,-Werror
Maintenance only
vax --target=vax-netbsd ,-Werror
Maintenance only
w65 Deleted.
x86-64 --target=x86_64-linux-gnu ,-Werror
Maintenance only
xstormy16 --target=xstormy16-elf ,-Werror
Corinna Vinschen vinschen@
z8k Deleted.
All developers recognized by this file can make arbitrary changes to
OBSOLETE targets.
All maintainers can test and thence approve non-trivial changes to
``maintenance only'' targets submitted by recognized developers.
All recognized developers can make mechanical changes (by virtue of
the obvious fix rule) to ``maintenance only'' targets. The change
shall be sanity checked by compiling with one of the listed targets.
The Bourne shell script gdb_mbuild.sh can be used to rebuild all the
above targets.
Host/Native:
The Native maintainer is responsible for target specific native
support - typically shared libraries and quirks to procfs/ptrace/...
The Native maintainer works with the Arch and Core maintainers when
resolving more generic problems.
The host maintainer ensures that gdb can be built as a cross debugger on
their platform.
AIX Peter Schauer Peter.Schauer@
Kevin Buettner kevinb@
djgpp native Eli Zaretskii eliz@
DJ Delorie dj@
MS Windows (NT, '00, 9x, Me, XP) host & native
Chris Faylor cgf@
GNU/Linux/x86 native & host
Mark Kettenis kettenis@
GNU/Linux PPC native Kevin Buettner kevinb@
GNU/Linux MIPS native & host
Daniel Jacobowitz dan@
GNU/Linux m68k Andreas Schwab schwab@
FreeBSD native & host Mark Kettenis kettenis@
David O'Brien obrien@
hurd native Mark Kettenis kettenis@
NetBSD native & host Jason Thorpe thorpej@
SCO/Unixware Robert Lipe rjl@
GNU/Linux ARM native Scott Bambrough scottb@
Solaris/x86 native & host (devolved)
Peter Schauer Peter.Schauer@
Solaris/SPARC native & host (devolved)
(Global Maintainers)
Core: Generic components used by all of GDB
generic arch support Andrew Cagney cagney@
Any host/target maintainer can add to
gdbarch.{c,h,sh}. Send tricky ones to cagney.
target vector Andrew Cagney cagney@
event loop Elena Zannoni ezannoni@
For the part of top.c related to the event loop,
send questions to ezannoni@
generic symtabs Jim Blandy jimb@
Elena Zannoni ezannoni@
dwarf readers Jim Blandy jimb@
Elena Zannoni ezannoni@
elf reader Jim Blandy jimb@
Elena Zannoni ezannoni@
stabs reader Jim Blandy jimb@
Elena Zannoni ezannoni@
coff reader Philippe De Muyter phdm@
xcoff reader Any maintainer can modify this; please send tricky
ones to Kevin Buettner <kevinb@
linespec Elena Zannoni ezannoni@
HP/UX readers Any [past] maintainer can modify this.
Please send tricky ones to the symtabs maintainers.
tracing bytecode stuff Jim Blandy jimb@
tracing Michael Snyder msnyder@
threads Michael Snyder msnyder@
Mark Kettenis kettenis@
breakpoints (Global Maintainers)
language support (Blanket Write Privs Maintainers)
C++ Daniel Jacobowitz dan@
Java support (Global Maintainers)
Pascal support Pierre Muller muller@
Objective C support Adam Fedor fedor@
shared libs (devolved) Kevin Buettner kevinb@
xcoffsolib Peter Schauer Peter.Schauer@
remote.c Andrew Cagney cagney@
include/remote-sim.h, remote-sim.c
Andrew Cagney cagney@
sds protocol (vacant)
rdi/adp protocol (vacant)
documentation Eli Zaretskii eliz@
testsuite (Global Maintainers)
config Mark Salter msalter@
lib Fernando Nasser fnasser@
Mark Salter msalter@
gdbtk (gdb.gdbtk) Keith Seitz keiths@
c++ (gdb.cp) Michael Chastain mec.gnu@
David Carlton carlton@
mi tests (gdb.mi) Elena Zannoni ezannoni@
Andrew Cagney cagney@
stabs (gdb.stabs) Elena Zannoni ezannoni@
threads (gdb.threads) Michael Snyder msnyder@
trace (gdb.trace) Michael Snyder msnyder@
hp tests (gdb.hp) (vacant)
Java tests (gdb.java) Anthony Green green@
Kernel Object Display Fernando Nasser fnasser@
UI: External (user) interfaces.
command interpreter (Global Maintainers)
gdbtk (c & tcl) Jim Ingham jingham@
Fernando Nasser fnasser@
Keith Seitz keiths@
libgui (w/foundry, sn) Jim Ingham jingham@
Keith Seitz keiths@
mi (gdb/mi) Andrew Cagney cagney@
Elena Zannoni ezannoni@
Fernando Nasser fnasser@
tui Stephane Carrez stcarrez@
(Global Maintainers)
Misc:
gdb/gdbserver Daniel Jacobowitz dan@
Web pages. Jim Kingdon jkingdon@
(anyone can edit; kingdon is just lead maintainer)
Makefile.in, configure* ALL
mmalloc/ ALL Host maintainers
NEWS ALL
sim/ See sim/MAINTAINERS
readline/ Master version: ftp://ftp.cwru.edu/pub/bash/
Elena Zannoni ezannoni@
Host maintainers (host dependant parts)
(but get your changes into the master version)
tcl/ tk/ itcl/ Ian Roxborough irox@
Write After Approval
(alphabetic)
To get recommended for the Write After Approval list you need a valid
FSF assignment and have submitted one good patch.
[...]
Past Maintainers
[...]
Folks that have been caught up in a paper trail:
[...]
--
(*) Indicates folks that don't have a Kerberos/SSH account in the GDB
group.
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, (continued)
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Jim Blandy, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Andrew Cagney, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, David Carlton, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Elena Zannoni, 2004/01/30
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Andrew Cagney, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, David Carlton, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules,
Andrew Cagney <=
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/29
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Andrew Cagney, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Andrew Cagney, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Michael Snyder, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Ian Lance Taylor, 2004/01/30
- Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/31
Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/31