[Gdbheads] Re: Feb's patch resolution rate

[Andrew Cagney]

> On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 16:31:52 -0500, Andrew Cagney <address@hidden> said:
>
>
> > > BTW, did you ever get round to doing an analysis on who was reviewing
> > > the symbol table patches.
>
>
> I haven't done a formal analysis, no

Here, for instance, is a graph illustrating how many patches over and 
above Jim, elena reviewed '03:

01: ------------------
02: ++++------------------------------
03: +----
04: +----------
05: +-------------
06: -----------
07: ++-------------
08: --+
09: ++++----------
10: +++-------------
11: +++-----
12: +++++----

+: Jim; -: Elena (Hmm, what happened in August?), and here's who 
reviewed your patches:

01: ----
02: ----------
03: --
04: --
05: -----
06: ---
07:
08:
09: +
10:
11:
12:

Hmm, I should have also counted who reviewed Daniels patches as I now 
suspect the results would be similar.

If anything it should be Elena and you maintaining the symbol table.

Andrew